CHASING ILLUSIONS
2D Animation: Offers flat, top-down views that are often difficult for non-technical teams to interpret. Misinterpretations can lead to errors in layout execution. 3D Animation: Provides an immersive, realistic view of the entire space, improving spatial understanding by over 70% compared to 2D designs.
2D Animation: Limited depth perception makes it harder to spot design flaws or machinery placement conflicts until late stages. 3D Animation: Enables early detection of layout clashes and bottlenecks, reducing rework costs by up to 40%.
2D Animation: Requires technical knowledge to fully grasp, making it less effective for presentations to non-engineering stakeholders. 3D Animation: Engages all stakeholders with realistic walkthroughs, improving communication and approval speed by nearly 50%.
2D Animation: Static and less engaging, resulting in lower knowledge retention during training sessions. 3D Animation: Interactive and visually rich, enhancing employee understanding and reducing training time by 30-50%.
2D Animation: Initial design is cheaper, but leads to higher revision costs and longer planning timelines. 3D Animation: Though slightly higher in upfront cost, it saves 25-35% overall by cutting delays, avoiding mistakes, and shortening project cycles.